• Document.no: Pogroms in Oslo
    Document.no is more than a blog, it is a community. Whatsmore it is intelligent, well-mannered and subsequently growing, which makes a lot of people somewhat worried. Document.no now offers a lengthy post on Norwegian author Eirik Eiglad’s book “The anti-jewish riots in Oslo”. Unauthorized translation from Pogroms in Oslo: Researchers and the police can say: […]
  • Malmö: Ever since I came here people have been shouting ‘fucking Jew’ at me
    Anyone concerned for the re-emergence of anti-Semitism in Scandinavia who is not reading Sweden, Israel and the Jews is robbing themselves blind. If you follow Sweden, this is the place to go. Ilya Meyer has a larger archive. On the other hand Norwegian newspapers, with exception being made for Aftenposten, are not particularly interested in [...] […]
  • ‘Jews themselves wrote lists of whom were to die in concentration camps’
    The University of Oslo wants to fire a history professor – appearently for having violated its health, environment and safety (HES) code. Protesters say this has nothing to do with HES and everything to do with the Univeristy curtailing the freedom of expression of its staff. One of the protestors is Professor of Law Jan [...] […]
  • Norwegian funnymen fearful of insulting Muhammed
    Norwegian comedian Thomas Seltzer. Picture from NRK P3. In 2006 funnyman Otto Jespersen demonstrated his courageous wit by torching the Bible. When asked why he did not burn the Koran, he replied: “We considered that too, but could not get hold of a copy. What is more I am 52 years old now and reckon [...] […]
  • Støre and Syria, Bishops’ Boycott
    FM Jonas Gahr Støre met with Syria’s FM Muallem on Monday8th. Nothing much in the media about that, not at all. Syria hardly registers at all. In the clip above you see a program from Syrian television. Does not this look like the kind of society Norwegians ought to be worried over? Remember [...] […]
  • VG on Bishops’ Boycott
    Verdens Gang (VG) - Norway's largest daily Verdens Gang (VG) is Norway’s largest daily. In today’s editorial the newspaper claims that the Bishops Boycott is, pretty much, a walk down nonsense street. Unauthorized translation: We believe that the Bishops ought to bury the though of a boycott of trade as soon as possible. They receive the [...] […]
  • No Press Accreditation for PR-woman Yngvild Mortensen
    Qassam rockets: from Ynet news Dagbladet reports on how freelancing journalist Yngvild Mortensen has her knickers in a twist as Israel refuses to grant her press accreditation. The reason Ms.Mortensen is not getting one is because she is a freelancer, and not in steady employ. When one looks back upon the long series of biased [...] […]
  • Is Dagbladet confusing Gaza with the Westbank?
    Dagbladet attributes this picture to Gaza, by Reuters, Elilana Aponte and Scanpix. The picture above is from an article in Dabladet titled “New peace talks between Israelis and Palestinians“. The first half hour the picture did not have any explaining subtext, which easily might have lead readers to believe the picture shows an Israeli kicking [...] […]
  • FM Støre, Dr Mads, Syversen on the Bishops’ Boycott
    Norwegian Bishops have come up with the idea that boycotting Israel just might be a fine idea. Foreign Minister Jonas Ghar Støre is opposed to a boycott and says so in today’s Verdens Gang – Norway’s largest daily. Unauthorized translation: – It is good that the Church speaks out for the opprssed, but the Church’s main [...] […]
  • Editor slams Bishops’ Boycott
    DagenMagazinet For Vebjørn Selbekk “freedom of expression” is more than just words, as is “courage”. After publishing an article on the cartoon-war in 2006, he became embroiled in it himself, receiving only luke-warm support from the Norwegian intelligensia and political establishment as he stood up for his editorial right to publish news-stories on relevant […]

The anti-Israel lobby in Norway

lobby

Norwegians are often told about the Israel-lobby in the US and its influence on US foreign policy. Of far more interest to us Norwegians however, is the anti-Israel lobby in Norway and its influence on Norwegian foreign policy. The Venn diagram above captures the main components of this lobby; 1) a pro-Palestinian component (Palestinakommiteen) 5) a racist component (Vigrid, Muhammed Ali Chisti, Arfan Bhatti) and 7) an anti-Zionist component (One-state solution proponents such as Nils Butenschøn). The corresponding intersects are 2,3,4 and 6. While it is difficult to allocate contemporary individuals to either of the subsets, Per Imerslund (1912-1943) exemplifies how one can be anti-Semitic and pro-Zionist at the same time, although this precise example is a subject of debate in itself.

The components differ from each other. Their objectives are not the same. For instance LO (Main Norwegian TUC) support for the Palestinian cause and calls for sanctions against Israel are based on the organization’s political outlook, not racism. Contrariwise Neo-Nazis (arguably- for Nazis, racism and politics are inseperable) base their hostility against Israel on racism. Yet the components overlap and intersect. Just as there are pro-Palestinians who are in favor of a jewish state, there are anti-Zionists who are racially motivated and racists who sympathize with Israel’s enemies. The common interest of the groups, organizations and individuals which together constitute the anti-Israel lobby lies in criticism of Israel as a jewish state.

But how do we describe the anti-Israel lobby beyond this?

Stephen Walt and John J. Mearsheimer define and assess the Israel-lobby in the USA in their book: The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy. As this book is on US affairs with which few Norwegians are familiar, it is difficult to assess to what extent the arguments presented are reliable and valid. Norwegians however might find it an interesting experiment to substitute “Norway” for “USA” and “anti-Israel” for “Israel”. In which case we find the following (The Israel Lobby, page 112), with substituted words highlighted in red:

Defining the Lobby

We use “anti-Israel Lobby” as a convenient shorthand term for the loose coalition of individuals and organizations that actively work to shape Norwegian foreign policy in an anti-Israel direction. The lobby is not a single, unified movement with a central leadership, however, and the individuals and groups that make up this broad coalition sometimes disagree on specific policy issues. Nor is it some sort of cabal or conspiracy. On the contrary, the organizations and individuals who make up the lobby operate out in the open and in the same way that other interest groups do.

Now obviously this little exercise is no proof of anything. One cannot merely substitute individual words and then claim it constitutes research. But what this exercise does do is illustrate how the analysis of Walt and Mearsheimer may be applied to Norway, though it will hardly provide the same results.

This site will attempt to apply the analysis of Walt and Mearsheimer to Norwegian foreign policy.